Go Back   #1 Chat Avenue Message Boards > Main Forums > Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Gallery Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Gay Marriage To Be Legal In Iowa
Old 04-05-2009, 05:22 PM   #1
The Voice
A True Chatmaster
 
The Voice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 40° 34′ 33″ N, 84° 11′ 34″ W
Posts: 27,860
Blog Entries: 1
The Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond repute
Red face Gay Marriage To Be Legal In Iowa

Iowa court backs gay marriage


(CNN) -- The Iowa Supreme Court unanimously rejected a state law Friday that banned same-sex marriage, and opponents wasted little time in pushing for a state constitutional amendment that could send the issue to voters.

But nothing could dampen the spirits of the six same-sex couples who shouted and clapped at a news conference held by Lambda Legal after hearing the court's opinion. Lambda Legal bills itself as the nation's oldest and largest legal group working for the civil rights of gays.

Two by two, the excited couples -- some with children -- spoke at the briefing.

"Good morning, my name is Kate Varnum, and I'd like to introduce you to my fiance, Trish Varnum. I never thought I'd be able to say that."
Dawn BarbouRoske told the group, "We're proud that our kids will be able to grow up knowing their family is respected."

Her daughter added: "Hi, I'm McKinley, and I'm really, really happy. I feel that my family has always had this right, and today it is true. No longer shall we be just people who aren't allowed to be married. We are able to get married."

Lambda Legal filed the lawsuit against Polk County's former recorder on behalf of the six same-sex couples.

"This is a great day for civil rights in Iowa," said former Iowa Solicitor-General Dennis Johnson, a co-counsel with Lambda Legal. "Go get married. Live happily ever."

The court's decision becomes effective in 21 days, and county recorders then will be required to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples, Lambda senior staff attorney Camilla Taylor said at the news conference.

"You do not have to be an Iowan to seek a license here," she said, and Iowa should recognize same-sex marriages from other states.

Iowa will become the third state in the nation to allow same-sex marriage, after Massachusetts and Connecticut.

Not everyone was pleased.

"It's, quite frankly, a disaster," said Brian English, a spokesman for the Iowa Family Policy Center, a nonprofit research and educational organization committed to strengthening the family.

"Obviously, we're extremely disappointed," he said. "We're saddened. Perhaps a little bit surprised in the unanimous decision that the court handed down."

English, who said opponents of gay marriage prayed outside the courthouse Friday as they awaited the court's decision, already has begun lobbying the legislature for an Iowa Marriage Amendment.

"It (the proposed amendment) will be very brief. It will reaffirm in the state constitution that marriage is the union of one man and one woman," he said. "We're beginning the next step in the process."

A spokesman for One Iowa, which supports gay and lesbian equality, said the earliest the issue could get on a ballot would be 2012.

Friday's decision upheld a 2007 ruling by a lower court that Iowa's 1998 law limiting marriage to heterosexual couples went against the state's constitution.

The state's highest court determined that "the Iowa statute limiting civil marriage to a union between a man and a woman violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution," court spokesman Steve Davis said in a written statement .Read PDF of court ruling

"The decision strikes the language from Iowa Code section 595.2 limiting civil marriage to a man and a woman. It further directs that the remaining statutory language be interpreted and applied in a manner allowing gay and lesbian people full access to the institution of civil marriage," the statement on the court's Web site says.

The Iowa Supreme Court said it has the responsibility to determine whether a law enacted by the legislative branch and enforced by the executive branch violates the Iowa Constitution.

"The court reaffirmed that a statute inconsistent with the Iowa Constitution must be declared void, even though it may be supported by strong and deep-seated traditional beliefs and popular opinion," the court said.

Polk County District Judge Robert Hanson earlier determined that the law violated the state constitution's guarantee of equal protection and hurt gay and lesbian couples "in numerous tangible and intangible" ways.

"Civil marriage in Iowa is the only gateway to an extensive legal structure that protects a married couple's relationship and family in and outside the state," Hanson ruled in Des Moines. "Iowa reserves an unparalleled array of rights, obligations and benefits to married couples and their families, privileging married couples as a financial and legal unit and stigmatizing same-sex couples."

The case was joined on appeal by several state lawmakers who opposed Hanson's ruling, calling it "a mockery of the judicial system."

They argued that the ruling stepped on the state legislature's authority by using the courts "to effectuate fundamental changes in public policies regarding marriage."

At the news conference, Jason Morgan, who was with his partner, Chuck Swaggerty, said they had been together nearly 12 years.

"We've been together in sickness and health, through the death of his mother, through the adoption of our children, through four long years of this legal battle," Morgan said, choking up. "And if being together through all of that isn't love and commitment or isn't family or isn't marriage, then I don't know what is."

Source: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/03/iowa.same.sex/

Additional Source: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/art.../90403010/1001



Dude ... Iowa. Fucking Iowa???
__________________
The Voice is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 04-05-2009, 10:55 PM   #2
PhillyStorm
Gay Chat Administrator
 
PhillyStorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On the other side.
Posts: 18,377
PhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond repute
Default

So this would be the fourth state to back gay marriage?
__________________
Xavier <3
ChickstaStorm
~My Wifey~
PhillyStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 02:09 AM   #3
The Voice
A True Chatmaster
 
The Voice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 40° 34′ 33″ N, 84° 11′ 34″ W
Posts: 27,860
Blog Entries: 1
The Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Yes. Vermont has a bill that's going through the legislative process right now but their Republican governor has indicated he would veto it should it reach his desk. California's Prop 8 is still being mulled over by their State Supreme Court and a decision should be coming within the next month or so.
__________________
The Voice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 03:30 PM   #4
Who
Fitz William
 
Who's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pen island
Posts: 5,817
Blog Entries: 6
Who has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond reputeWho has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Connecticut still the only one that had it voted in unanimously.

Now other states, one by one will follow.
__________________

хорошие милостивейшие большие шарики пожара.
"I'll automatic fag your gander now in a minute if you don't shut up."

Who is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 02:09 AM   #5
The Voice
A True Chatmaster
 
The Voice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: 40° 34′ 33″ N, 84° 11′ 34″ W
Posts: 27,860
Blog Entries: 1
The Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond reputeThe Voice has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Vermont Legalizes Gay Marriage


By DAVE GRAM, AP
posted: 5 DAYS 6 HOURS AGO
comments: 2641


MONTPELIER, Vt. (April 7) - Vermont, the state that invented civil unions, on Tuesday became a pioneer once again as the first state to legalize gay marriage through a legislature's vote. The House barely achieved the votes necessary to override Gov. Jim Douglas' veto of a bill that will allow gays and lesbians to marry beginning September 1. Four states now have same-sex marriage laws and other states soon could follow suit.

Bills to allow same-sex marriage are currently before lawmakers in New Hampshire, Maine, New York and New Jersey. The three other states that currently allow same-sex marriage — Connecticut, Massachusetts and Iowa — each moved to do so through the courts, not legislatures.

"For a popularly elected legislature to make this decision is a much more democratic process" because lawmakers have to answer to the voters every other November, said Eric Davis, a retired Middlebury College political science professor.

Courts typically deal with arcane points of constitutional law. While legislatures debate some of the same principles, the process may become much more personal. In Vermont, some of the most gripping debate came when gay and lesbian lawmakers took to the House floor last Thursday and told their own personal love stories.

Getting gay marriage approved in a political, rather than purely legal, forum is a big step, said Boston University law professor Linda McLain, an expert on family law and policy. "What may give courage to other legislatures is that this legislature managed to do it," she said.

She added that using the civil rights language of equality — the measure in Vermont was dubbed the marriage equality bill — could help make gay marriage more acceptable elsewhere.

Opponents said they, too, believe activists will be emboldened in other states. The action comes just days after the Iowa Supreme court ruled that not permitting gay marriage there was unconstitutional.

"To the millions of Americans who care about marriage, we say get ready: President Obama and Democrats will use Vermont as an excuse to overturn the bipartisan federal Defense of Marriage Act," said Brian Brown, executive director of the National Organization for Marriage, which waged a radio campaign against the measure. "The next step is to ask the Supreme Court to impose gay marriage on all 50 states."

The Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, defines marriage as a legal union between a man and a woman, and provides that states need not recognize the marriage of a same sex couple from another state.

To date, the same-sex marriage movement's main gains have been in New England, which some attribute to Yankee liberalism and the gradual acceptance of gay relationships after Vermont's groundbreaking civil unions law took effect in 2000.

Douglas had announced his intent to veto the gay marriage bill two weeks ago, saying he believed marriage should be limited to a man and a woman and calling the issue a distraction during a time when economic and budget issues were more important.

In Tuesday's vote, a "yes" was needed from two-thirds of those present to override the governor's veto. The goal was easily achieved in the Senate, which voted 23-5, but in the House it was much closer, 100-49.

The speaker's announcement of the results to a packed Statehouse chamber, set off whistles and cheers among supporters whose hopes had been temporarily dashed last month when the Republican governor announced he would veto the measure if it passed the Legislature.

Among the celebrants: Former state lawmaker Robert Dostis and his longtime partner, Chuck Kletecka. Dostis recalled efforts to expand gay rights dating to an anti-discrimination law passed in 1992.

"It's been a very long battle. It's been almost 20 years to get to this point," Dostis said. "I think finally, most people in Vermont understand that we're a couple like any other couple. We're as good and as bad as any other group of people."

Dostis said he and Kletecka will celebrate their 25th year together in September.

"Is that a proposal?" Kletecka asked.

"Yeah," Dostis replied. "Twenty-five years together, I think it's time we finally got married."

Craig Bensen, a gay marriage opponent who had lobbied unsuccessfully for a nonbinding referendum on the question, said his side was outspent by supporters by 20-1.

"The other side had a highly funded, extremely well-oiled machine with all the political leadership except the governor pushing to make this happen," he said. "The fact that it came down to this tight a vote is really astounding."

The measure had only 95 "yea" votes when it passed the House on Friday. But some changed their votes Tuesday.

Rep. Jeff Young, D-St. Albans, who voted no twice because he's philosophically opposed to gay marriage, joined most other Democrats in voting to override Douglas' veto.

"I think if I wanted to continue my career here and have any chance of being effective, I had to vote with my caucus," he said.

"You have some pet projects, you think you can help your district back home with things that need to happen," he said. "I want to get a railroading bill through. I wouldn't even have had a chance to testify, let alone get it through. Now, people will listen to me. It's the way the political game is played."

House Speaker Shap Smith said he didn't use any specific arguments to get lawmakers to switch. He said he had argued mainly that they should support the will of the legislative majorities on the bill's initial approvals — 95-52 in the House and 26-4 in the Senate.

"I thought it was to some degree just a vote to recognize the work that the Legislature had done," the speaker said.

Sitting next to him was Rep. William Lippert, D-Hinesburg, a gay man who championed both the 2000 civil unions bill and this year's gay marriage legislation.

"It's been an incredibly powerful personal journey," Lippert said. "I consider it my personal great good fortune to be a member of the Vermont Legislature under the leadership of speakers who have in fact prioritized civil rights for the community of which I'm a part. It touches me deeply."

Copyright 2009 The Associated Press.

Source: http://news.aol.com/article/vermont-gay-marriage/417672


.
__________________
The Voice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 02:13 AM   #6
PhillyStorm
Gay Chat Administrator
 
PhillyStorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: On the other side.
Posts: 18,377
PhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond reputePhillyStorm has a reputation beyond repute
Default

It's only a matter of time before all states legalize gay marriage.
__________________
Xavier <3
ChickstaStorm
~My Wifey~
PhillyStorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 02:21 AM   #7
Samoshi
Kids Chat Mod
 
Samoshi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Haus Of GaGa
Posts: 13,181
Samoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond reputeSamoshi has a reputation beyond repute
Default

.. then it'll hit Aus.
__________________
Pop ate my heart, like a Beautiful Monster


LADY | GAGA

Baby loves to Dance In The Dark, Cause when he's looking she falls apart
Baby loves to Dance In The Dark
Samoshi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 06:59 AM   #8
StrangeMagic
Junior Chatterbox
 
StrangeMagic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,159
Blog Entries: 26
StrangeMagic has disabled reputation
Default

Gay marriage should be legal fullstop.
__________________


Let me hold you, thrill you, kiss you with my fangs!


StrangeMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2009, 11:42 AM   #9
Luka
John O' Scots.
 
Luka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: City Of Wonder.
Posts: 38,731
Luka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond reputeLuka has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I just wonder why it's now legalizing it in USA 6 years after Britain.

Why so long?
__________________

'Cause we were both young, when I first saw you.
Luka is offline   Reply With Quote
aye xxxxxx
Old 04-13-2009, 12:32 PM   #10
toby
Gay Chat Mod
 
toby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: cloud of sugar puffs
Posts: 869
toby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond reputetoby has a reputation beyond repute
Default aye xxxxxx

Quote:
Originally Posted by *Prudence* View Post
I just wonder why it's now legalizing it in USA 6 years after Britain.

Why so long?
God we gotta beat them at somthing lol xxxxxx

tobes xxxxxxxxxxx
__________________
FILL YOUR HAND YOU SON OF A BITCH !!!!!


toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1999-2009 - #1 Chat Avenue - Free chat rooms for adults, gays, kids, singles, teens and more.