Go Back   #1 Chat Avenue Message Boards > Other Forums > Science and Technology
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Gallery Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Bigger is smarter: Overall, not relative, brain size predicts intelligence
Old 05-19-2007, 03:47 AM   #1
StubleU
Forum Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,265
StubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond reputeStubleU has a reputation beyond repute
Default Bigger is smarter: Overall, not relative, brain size predicts intelligence

When it comes to estimating the intelligence of various animal species, it may be as simple measuring overall brain size. In fact, making corrections for a species' body size may be a mistake. The findings were reported by researchers at Grand Valley State University and the Anthropological Institute and Museum at the University of Zürich, Switzerland. The study has now been published online in the journal Brain, Behavior, and Evolution.

"It's long been known that species with larger body sizes generally have larger brains," said Robert Deaner, assistant professor of psychology at Grand Valley and the first author on the study. "Scientists have generally assumed that this pattern occurs because larger animals require larger nervous systems to coordinate their larger bodies. But our results suggest a simpler reason: larger species are typically smarter."

Deaner said the findings imply that a re-evaluation may be in order for many previous studies that have compared brain size across different animal species, including ancestral hominids.

The new results build on a paper by the same researchers, published in the online journal Evolutionary Psychology, in July 2006, which showed that some primate species consistently outperform others across a broad range of cognitive tasks. That finding provided evidence for species differences in intelligence or "domain-general cognition," in the parlance of the field. This intelligence allows an animal to tackle new and unpredictable situations. Domain-general cognitive ability stands in contrast to domain-specific skills that are suited to particular environment challenges, such as a bird remembering where it cached food.

The new study compared how well eight different brain size measures predicted the domain-general cognition variable generated in the earlier study. To the researchers' surprise, overall brain size and overall neocortex size proved to be good predictors, but the various measures that controlled for body size did not. The results did not change even when various statistical assumptions were altered.

Another unexpected finding was that the overall size of the whole brain proved to be just as good a predictor of intelligence as was the overall size of the neocortex. Scientists making cross-species comparisons have often assumed that the neocortex would be more closely linked to intelligence, since it is considered the "thinking part" of the brain.

The findings raise the question of why larger animals should generally be smarter. "That's now the $64,000 question," said Carel van Schaik, Ph.D., a co-author on the study and the director of the Anthropological Institute and Museum at the University of Zurich. "We have some ideas. Larger animals may be better able to control aspects of their environment and therefore have more to gain from being more intelligent. But perhaps more important is that larger animals tend to live longer, and can therefore benefit longer from being flexible and adaptable, and perhaps may also need it more because the environment is more likely to change during their lifetime. The challenge is to test these ideas."

The authors warned that the study's primary implication-that body size need not be considered when comparing brain size-shouldn't be taken too literally. Deaner noted, "We believe that most of the relationship between brain size and body size is due to larger animals being smarter, but it's certainly possible-even likely-that some part of the relationship is due to larger animals needing to maintain greater neural traffic. Our point is that completely controlling for body size is almost certainly a mistake."

"We didn't have data on enough species to address this question conclusively," Deaner said. "But the human brain imaging data indicate that some correction for 'neural traffic maintenance' is probably needed. If it wasn't needed, then we would be stuck with some real puzzles, such as the fact that there are no consistent *** differences in IQ, yet men generally have larger brains. And, of course, elephants and whales possess larger brains than we do, yet it's hard for us to imagine that they are smarter than we are."
StubleU is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 05-22-2007, 10:32 AM   #2
The Girl From Ipanema
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,030
The Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond repute
Default

I remember learning about this in biopsych.

Except the prof said that a larger brain isn't what makes us smarter. It's the organization between the cells and the efficiency of the networks that can make humans smarter than say elephants.

I'm not sure whatmy stance is on body size/brain size/intelligence. But I do know that bats or cats...one of the two was considered to be smarter than an elephant and yet they have much smaller brains than an elephant.

I think fine motor movements might have something to do with it. I think the bigger you are, the harder it is for you to do certain things (such as lets say balancing on a beam...most humans can do that and a cat could do that...but an elephant obviously couldn't).

Or fitting digits (fingers, toes) in small areas to carry out tasks....(for lack of a better example lol).

I think the theory of more complex behavior = more complex brain but not necessarily bigger brain is most plausible for this question.
The Girl From Ipanema is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2007, 06:51 PM   #3
Blindsided.
prawn phisher
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Pennsylvania.
Posts: 10,337
Blindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond reputeBlindsided. has a reputation beyond repute
Default

whether or not this is relevant or has already been said in this thread and I missed it..

Einstein was said to be so smart because of his brain being larger and holding twists and winds allowing a larger surface area proximity .. thing..
__________________
Blindsided. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2007, 10:24 AM   #4
The Girl From Ipanema
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,030
The Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond reputeThe Girl From Ipanema has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blindsided. View Post
whether or not this is relevant or has already been said in this thread and I missed it..

Einstein was said to be so smart because of his brain being larger and holding twists and winds allowing a larger surface area proximity .. thing..
Hmmm that's interesting....I'd like to look into that to see why people think that...or what their explanations are for it.

Twists and winds being gyri and sulci i assume (grooves and folds of the cortex).

I guess it could be a plausible theory, but I think it would be hard to pass by a lot of scientists out there.

The thing that's sooo incredibly wicked about the brain is that if you lose a part of it or if a part of it stops functioning properly it has an incredible ability to make amends for it by rectifying the problem area or compensating via another structure or component.

I just read that Einstein's brain was missing a certain small wrinkle (the parietal operculum) that most people have. So I think because he was missing this structure, other structures nearby became stronger and if these structures were heavily involved in mathematical reasoning then this may account for his intelligence specifically within the realm of mathematics and science.

Last edited by The Girl From Ipanema; 05-29-2007 at 10:28 AM.
The Girl From Ipanema is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 1999-2009 - #1 Chat Avenue - Free chat rooms for adults, gays, kids, singles, teens and more.